Match: 24
/ 635
Lost
by 74 runs
Team |
Total |
Wootton &
Bladon CC |
211 - 3 |
M. Rundle
2 - 35 |
|
|
|
FFTMCC |
137 |
J. Pyrah 41,
C. Williams 34 |
“You’re still young,
that’s your fault… There’s so much you have to know”. It was devastating news
indeed. Met with shock and surprise, in equal measure, as we gathered for a
DIY strategy meeting on the verdant expanse that is Brasenose College Sports
Ground, home yet again to our most regular opponents, for our 41st contest. But it seems it is true
– James Bateman is turning 30 this year! Son of Mark, the original ‘Old Man’
in the field – in the days when there was just one, rather than the 7 or 8 of
us, and once the Bladon ‘Youth Policy’. And now back briefly from Western Australia
to turn out for FFTMCC, for whom he flew the Bladon nest many years ago. Even
more remarkable to relate, pretty much exactly 20 years on from when he first
appeared for us (whether willingly or not, as presumably he was all of 9
years old) – by wonderful symmetry, also away to FFTMCC, on 8th August 2004
(we even let him bowl the following week – though it was against
Kirtlington). Bateman Jnr. But we could play the
Generation Game too, with the return of our own ‘prodigal son’ – Thomas Poole
– who has also emigrated to exotic, far-flung climes (Benson), for his first
game of the season. Which at least gave us a full 11 players, when we conducted
the usual, nervous headcount – we tend to oscillate precariously these days
between 9 and 14, even on a Sunday morning. It is a fixture and
venue which so often produces a low-scoring affair, tight and turgid on a
wicket often slowish and lowish. But the first sign that, this time, it may
be different was when an early toss was taken – and Jack Barber only went and
won it! And chose to bat, emboldened by our (on paper) strong batting line up
– though as FFTMCC invariably choose to bowl, you could argue it didn’t
really count. An ensemble of Woottoners. But wait, what is this?
We had veteran trundlers Howarth and Turner opening the bowling – no sign of
the more heralded openers; “Tall Bob”, or “the guy who swings it a mile”, or
the “South African quick-who-is-surprisingly-not-quick” (we’ll actually learn
their real names one day). Maybe Captain Jack is a strategic genius after
all? He certainly looked it as our openers, (‘Shit’) Ash and Arun, quickly
bedded in for the long haul, milking the ones and twos on a soft outfield
with an occasional thumping flourish to the boundary (mostly from Arun,
obviously, but with ‘Aggressive Ash’ making an occasional cameo appearance).
The scoreboard ticked on at around 6 an over as we lounged in the pleasantly hazy
August sunshine, the hope realistic that most of us wouldn’t have to bat at
all. Our first concern, then,
was to keep Arun out there – though not everyone was happy with the plan of
not clapping his 50. Maybe not even clapping his 100, as the debate raged and “Principled Nathan” teetered on the edge of full
meltdown – Nicko arguing persuasively that we COULD clap him when he reached
150. We worried our ruse might get exposed if Ash made it to 50 first, though
our scorer (TP) was able to confirm that this was NOT going to be a problem,
any time soon (he had already committed the rookie scorer error of filling
the entire first line, mostly with dots, with Ash on a full 18). As it was,
we had to stop Arun walking off at drinks after the 22nd over (by coming
clean that he was already on 95). So, he was indeed finally off just a few
balls later – 100 not out, his third WBCC ton – with 137 already on the
board. The final tally of the oppo innings displayed on
the brand new spanking scoreboard. Which continued to tick
steadily higher as Nicko and Ash happily knocked it around and into the
yawning gaps in the field, now spread to all corners. Nicko will take on any
field, of course, and got away with a couple in the air – but soon enough
holed out to a gleeful Howarth at long-off, for a quick 18. Nathan couldn’t
repeat his heroics of last week, edging behind for a brisk 5, to bring in
Thomas who was also soon into his stride, for all the inevitable rustiness. Ash’s marathon effort
finally ended, bowled for 40 off 89 balls, with the score on 185. The run
rate faltered as we began to question Jack’s wisdom in promoting himself up
to No.6 – but just as it looked like we were going to fall woefully short of
the total our batting deserved, and cheered on by his visiting ‘Fan Club’, he
found the middle of his bat – and the boundary – a few times, and a big 35th
and final over got us up there, or thereabouts, at 211 for 3. Jack unbeaten
on 16 and Thomas on 18, after flicking a languid, majestic ‘6’ over backward
square-leg off the final ball of the innings – pretty much exactly as his
father had done only a few weeks previously. It must be a genetic thing…
fathers and sons again. You certainly can’t learn it. The teas were certainly enjoyed…. As we enjoyed our teas
‘alfresco’ – and it’s always a good tea at FFTMCC, they know what really matters
– there was some “big talk” from the oppo, suggesting it was merely a par
score, maybe even less, on a lifeless wicket. Though, like us, they can spin
a good yarn unencumbered by the actual truth of it and both sides knew it
would be a tall order – not least as most of our contests are settled with
the ball, rather than the bat. But still, it was a fast
start to the FFTMCC innings, with opener Chris Williams again coming out
firing – he’s won at least one of our recent games with such an early
onslaught. So, they were easily getting the required more-or-less 6 an over
in the early skirmishes. But there were chances offered aplenty and the
wickets not long in coming – Bill grabbed a high catch at cover off Ryan
Wastie (7-1-35-1) to remove Williams, while at the other end, Steve Edwards
(7-1-31-2) – as predicted, now very much back to the opening bowler of
fearsome historical renown – made a mess of James Bateman’s stumps, and his
10,000 mile journey, with a cleverly disguised (even) slower one – for wicket
No.496. And then No.497, with the younger Williams (yet another Father and Son
feature) wafting, and edging, into Gary Doggett’s safe hands. Williams splats one towards his parents where
Wendy is telling Trevor off (reason unknown). They were going to need
to accelerate again – but our timeless, tenacious first-change spin double
act had other ideas. Sure, there were a few lusty legside blows from No.3
Pyrah off both Bill and Poolie Snr, seizing on
anything fractionally short – though he seemed strangely all at sea to
anything on or outside off stump (who would have such a one-sided player?!).
Bill (7-0-27-1) got one wicket, clean bowled, and could (should) have had a
couple more, with successive, compelling LBW shouts ruled out for apparently
obstructing the umpire’s view (though I’m pretty sure I wasn’t really in the
way for the second at least; more a convenient – you have to admit, admirable
– excuse for the wily old umpire to turn another one down). We did nick a wicket on
a suicidal mix-up, when they tried to steal a quick single to absolutely the
wrong fielder – Arun – and Bill managed to gather Arun’s somewhat
full-blooded throw to remove the bails, both batsmen stranded at the other
end. Meanwhile Poolie (7-0-29-2) was teasing and
tempting; he finally trapped Pyrah LBW and then saw Ian Howarth tamely
feather an edge into Gary’s gloves – an innocuous looking scalp, perhaps, but
one of some 170 years combined associated vintage. If Ian swiftly shouldered
arms and marched off, it was perhaps less down to embarrassment than the
urgency in getting down to the traditionally more important job, of spinning
the narrative – for himself as much as anyone who would listen – as to which
section of the River Isis he really could’ve launched that one into, if he’d
wanted. Wastie prepares to ‘ave
one in past a watching Bateman. So only 4 an over off
our spin ‘attack’ meant nearly 90 still required off the final 7, with only 3
wickets in hand. Probably not… and certainly not when we can bring on our
‘Next Generation’ bowlers to finish them off. Nathan (3-0-9-2) and his
natural bounce off a length was a handful for their tailenders, and
successive catches were flapped to Arun in the covers – while at the other
end, “Merv” Barber (2.1-0-6-1) again charged in with menace and purpose and a
barrage of bouncers, though it was with a perfectly pitched peach that he
bowled their No.11, “top of off”, to end the FFTMCC resistance for 137, and
the match a couple of overs early. And to cap a good day for Jack all round. A very solid
performance, serene from start to finish really, in an emphatic win and we
could enjoy our post-match beers in the fading summer sun. As such, it was a
high benchmark for the select few Man of the Match
nominees (which probably should have included Captain Jack, though he must
have learned by now, skippering Bladon is the very definition of a “thankless
task”). Ash Hambridge, of course, for another masterclass in occupation of
the crease (and now our leader in Most Balls Faced Ever, with 8,195, passing
Stephen Poole’s total a couple of weeks back). Plus
Gary, for two good catches (and very little else let through him); Thomas,
for his flamboyant ‘6’ to close out our innings; and once again the ‘Bowling
Unit’ for collective competence, all with at least one wicket. But sometimes
you really have to hand it to Arun – so we did – for his latest unbeaten ton
(plus catches and run-out on top); his average now a mere 219.5 for the
season, and 416.0 for the club overall. Edwards tries wriggling between four people
dressed in white to chuck something. A select list, too, for
Mug of the Match, in a day (for once) remarkably free of foul-ups. Arun, for
peppering Gary’s elderly ankles with return throws (and also for retiring,
yet again), and Nicko, who similarly seemed to struggle in getting the
misbehaving ball back to the bowler. So, you could say Bill was unlucky to
win a comfortable vote, for his self-obscured plumb LBW shouts and an
unfortunate, if fleeting senior moment in the field, when he thought Poolie’s over was done – after 2 balls. A comfortable ‘winner’,
also, in the COTD vote. Sure, there were (deserved) mentions for Ryan, who
buggered off early, for “dinner”; Dom, absent at a PJ Harvey concert; Jase
Trinder, for letting us down when previously “70:30”; and Charvis, for
ruining James Bateman’s holiday back home. And Barbs for bringing along his
‘Fan Club’ – even if it brought out the best in him. But none of these could
challenge Nathan and his multiple crimes, namely sulking, bowling a high
beamer to their ageing, helmetless No.11 and for spending much of the day in
the field on his phone. The future might well belong to the younger
generation – but Christ alone knows what they’ll do with it. Pyrah clips one to leg and gives us the eyeball. “I was once like you are
now… and I know that it’s not easy.” Fathers and sons… a day of generational
footnotes, and generational reflection. In what is certainly a generational
fixture, in which we’ve now ‘come of age’ with our 21st victory – in the 21
years since we started playing them. Even if, for now, it is mostly, still,
contested by the ‘oldies’ – but one that will hopefully be picked up and
sustained by future generations when most of us really are no longer
physically capable (so next year, then, I hear the unkind among you
thinking). And comfortable as our
win was – and pleasingly, taking us within touching distance of another
‘winning season’, what would be our seventh in a row – it only levels up the
series with FFTMCC this season, one-all. They say you are only ever as good
as your last game – in which case, for once, it is something we can be proud
of. For a few more days anyway… with maybe even the odd chorus of “Can we
play you every week?!” Oh… it looks like we are. Fair enough, bring it on
again next week – anybody’s game, as the history books tell us. I just hope
there’ll be new stuff to write about…. An t-ůghdar. Nom de plumes: Arun
(White) Barbs
… Jack Barber or Captain Jack Charvis
… Steve Edwards Dom
… Dominic DeBono Gary
(Doggett) Nathan
(Haywood) Nicko
… Nick Hambridge South
African Quick … Cornelius Vermaak Shit
Ash (Hambridge) Tall
Bob … Chris Roberts Thomas
(Poole) … or Poole Jnr Guest Author: ’Mr Bill Dale’
|
*
Far From the MCC versus Wootton &
Bladon CC Played at Brasenose, 18 August 2024 Wootton & Bladon CC won the toss
and elected to bat Wootton & Bladon CC won by 74 runs Far from the MCC debuts: n/a |
24 / 635 35 over match |
Team |
Wootton & Bladon CC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Batsman |
How Out |
Total |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
FOW |
1 |
A.
Hambridge |
b Rundle |
40 |
|
- |
- |
1-164 |
2 |
A. White |
retired |
100 |
|
14 |
6 |
2-171 |
3 |
N.
Hambridge |
c Howarth b Rundle |
18 |
|
1 |
- |
3-185 |
4 |
N.
Haywood |
c Carter b Pyrah |
5 |
|
1 |
- |
|
5 |
T. Poole |
not out |
18 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
6 |
J.
Barber * |
not out |
16 |
|
3 |
- |
|
7 |
R.
Wastie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
G.
Doggett † |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
W. Dale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
S. Poole |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
S.
Edwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extras |
NB1, W5, LB5, B3 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
(for 3 wickets, 35 overs) |
211 |
|
|
|
|
# |
Bowler |
Overs |
Maidens |
Runs |
Wkts |
Econ |
|
1 |
Howarth |
7 |
0 |
38 |
0 |
5.43 |
|
2 |
Turner |
5 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
5.00 |
|
3 |
Hoskins |
6 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
4.83 |
|
4 |
Harris |
4 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
8.00 |
|
5 |
Pyrah |
4 |
0 |
23 |
1 |
5.75 |
|
6 |
Rundle |
6 |
0 |
35 |
2 |
5.83 |
|
7 |
Bateman |
3 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
7.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team |
Far from
the MCC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Batsman |
How Out |
Total |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
FOW |
1 |
C. T. J.
Williams |
c Dale b Wastie |
34 |
(32) |
4 |
- |
1-21 |
2 |
J. C.
Bateman |
b Edwards |
1 |
(5) |
- |
- |
2-45 |
3 |
J. S.
Pyrah |
lbw b S. Poole |
41 |
(47) |
4 |
- |
3-60 |
4 |
T. Kawada-Williams |
b Edwards |
8 |
(12) |
1 |
- |
4-70 |
5 |
J. C. W.
Hotson |
b Dale |
3 |
(23) |
- |
- |
5-103 |
6 |
J.
Harris |
run out (Dale) |
17 |
(23) |
3 |
- |
6-107 |
7 |
I.
Howarth |
c Doggett b S. Poole |
4 |
(4) |
1 |
- |
7-114 |
8 |
R. P.
Turner * |
not out |
14 |
(34) |
1 |
- |
8-129 |
9 |
M. S.
Rundle |
c White |
3 |
(15) |
- |
- |
9-129 |
10 |
J. D.
Hoskins |
c White |
0 |
(2) |
- |
- |
10-137 |
11 |
G.
Carter † |
b Barber |
0 |
(3) |
- |
- |
|
|
Extras |
NB5, W5, LB1, B1 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
(all out, 33.1 overs) |
134 |
|
|
|
|
# |
Bowler |
Overs |
Maidens |
Runs |
Wkts |
Econ |
|
1 |
Edwards |
7 |
1 |
31 |
2 |
4.43 |
|
2 |
Wastie |
7 |
1 |
33 |
1 |
4.71 |
|
3 |
Dale |
7 |
0 |
27 |
1 |
3.86 |
|
4 |
S. Poole |
7 |
0 |
29 |
2 |
4.14 |
|
5 |
Haywood |
3 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
3.00 |
|
6 |
Barber |
2.1 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2.77 |
|
MOTM: J. S. Pyrah Champagne Moment: I. Howarth’s catch at
long-on Buffet Award: J. Harris’ lemon drizzle cake (Cornish cream side) MAD Moment: Who shot Geoff? (JR Ewing) …
collapses on the floor behind the stumps simply turning around to receive
ball |
Opposition:
V025 / 041 Ground: G040 / 110 Captain: C024 / 096 Match No: 35 / 237 |